Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B from Qwen and Kimi K2 0711 from moonshotai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
| Attribute | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Kimi K2 0711 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.30/M tokens | $0.57/M tokens |
| Output price | $1/M tokens | $2.30/M tokens |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | Not available | Not available |
| Coding Index | Not available | Not available |
| Agentic Index | Not available | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 0.49 s | 1.30 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 93.5 tok/s | 32.0 tok/s |
| Provided by | Qwen | moonshotai |
| Model page | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B model details, providers and pricing | Kimi K2 0711 model details, providers and pricing |
Benchmark data updated
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is cheaper than Kimi K2 0711 on OpenRouter: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs $0.30/M tokens input and $1/M tokens output, while Kimi K2 0711 costs $0.57/M tokens input and $2.30/M tokens output.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has the longer context window at 262,144 tokens, compared with 131,072 tokens for Kimi K2 0711.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 93.5 tokens per second compared with 32.0 tokens per second for Kimi K2 0711.