Compare Qwen3.8 27B from Qwen and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 from DeepSeek on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.




Qwen3.8 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Qwen3.8 27B, from Qwen, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $0.0248/M tokens input, $4.35/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.007326/M tokens input, $0.1307/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Qwen3.8 27B | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.0248/M tokens | $0.007326/M tokens |
| Output price | $4.35/M tokens | $0.1307/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 33.7 | 34.3 |
| Coding Index | 68.1 | 69.1 |
| Agentic Index | 45.8 | 41.0 |
| Latency (p50) | 0.57 s | 3.77 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 39.0 tok/s | 16.0 tok/s |
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on OpenRouter: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.007326/M tokens input and $0.1307/M tokens output, while Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.0248/M tokens input and $4.35/M tokens output.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Qwen3.8 27B.
Qwen3.8 27B is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 39.0 tokens per second compared with 16.0 tokens per second for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 69.1 compared with 68.1 for Qwen3.8 27B.