Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemma 4 31B

Compare Qwen3.8 27B from Qwen and Gemma 4 31B from Google on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemma 4 31B: side-by-side summary

Qwen3.8 27B and Gemma 4 31B are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Qwen3.8 27B, from Qwen, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $0.02/M tokens input, $0.50/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Gemma 4 31B, from Google, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.10/M tokens input, $0.34/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window

Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens
Gemma 4 31B: 262,144 tokens

Price

Qwen3.8 27B: $0.02/M tokens input, $0.50/M tokens output
Gemma 4 31B: $0.10/M tokens input, $0.34/M tokens output

Provided by

Qwen3.8 27B: Qwen
Gemma 4 31B: Google

Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemma 4 31B at a glance

Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemma 4 31B comparison
Attribute	Qwen3.8 27B	Gemma 4 31B
Input price	$0.02/M tokens	$0.10/M tokens
Output price	$0.50/M tokens	$0.34/M tokens
Context window	1,000,000 tokens	262,144 tokens
Intelligence Index	33.7	13.9
Coding Index	68.1	33.2
Agentic Index	45.8	Not available
Latency (p50)	0.68 s	0.61 s
Throughput (p50)	42.5 tok/s	46.0 tok/s

Benchmark data updated Oct 15, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.8 27B cheaper than Gemma 4 31B?

Qwen3.8 27B and Gemma 4 31B trade off on price: Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.02/M tokens input and $0.50/M tokens output, while Gemma 4 31B costs $0.10/M tokens input and $0.34/M tokens output, so Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper for input tokens and Gemma 4 31B is cheaper for output tokens.

Which has the longer context window, Qwen3.8 27B or Gemma 4 31B?

Qwen3.8 27B has the longer context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 262,144 tokens for Gemma 4 31B.

Which is faster, Qwen3.8 27B or Gemma 4 31B?

Gemma 4 31B is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 46.0 tokens per second compared with 42.5 tokens per second for Qwen3.8 27B.

Which scores higher on coding, Qwen3.8 27B or Gemma 4 31B?

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 68.1 compared with 33.2 for Gemma 4 31B.

Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemma 4 31B

Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemma 4 31B

Overview