Compare Qwen3.8 Flash from Qwen and GLM 5.3 Flash from Z.ai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


Qwen3.8 Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
Qwen3.8 Flash, from Qwen, has a 1,000,000-token context window and is priced at $0.15/M tokens input, $0.47/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
GLM 5.3 Flash, from Z.ai, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.036/M tokens input, $0.90/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | Qwen3.8 Flash | GLM 5.3 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.15/M tokens | $0.036/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.47/M tokens | $0.90/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | Not available | 41.8 |
| Coding Index | Not available | 71.5 |
| Agentic Index | Not available | 50.9 |
| Latency (p50) | 1.64 s | 4.13 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 46.0 tok/s | 21.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
Qwen3.8 Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash trade off on price: Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15/M tokens input and $0.47/M tokens output, while GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.036/M tokens input and $0.90/M tokens output, so GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper for input tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper for output tokens.
GLM 5.3 Flash has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 tokens for Qwen3.8 Flash.
Qwen3.8 Flash is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 46.0 tokens per second compared with 21.0 tokens per second for GLM 5.3 Flash.