Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 vs Step 3.7 Flash

Compare Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 from Sao10K and Step 3.7 Flash from stepfun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 vs Step 3.7 Flash: side-by-side summary

Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 and Step 3.7 Flash are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1, from Sao10K, has a 16,000-token context window and is priced by the provider serving it on OpenRouter.

Step 3.7 Flash, from stepfun, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.20/M tokens input, $1.15/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window

Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1: 16,000 tokens
Step 3.7 Flash: 262,144 tokens

Price

Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1: Pricing varies by provider
Step 3.7 Flash: $0.20/M tokens input, $1.15/M tokens output

Provided by

Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1: Sao10K
Step 3.7 Flash: stepfun

Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 vs Step 3.7 Flash at a glance

Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 vs Step 3.7 Flash comparison
Attribute	Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1	Step 3.7 Flash
Input price	Pricing varies by provider	$0.20/M tokens
Output price	Pricing varies by provider	$1.15/M tokens
Context window	16,000 tokens	262,144 tokens
Intelligence Index	Not available	19.5
Coding Index	Not available	39.6
Agentic Index	Not available	Not available
Latency (p50)	Not available	4.19 s
Throughput (p50)	Not available	105.0 tok/s

Benchmark data updated Oct 13, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Which has the longer context window, Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash has the longer context window at 262,144 tokens, compared with 16,000 tokens for Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1.

Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 vs Step 3.7 Flash

Llama 3.1 70B Hanami x1 vs Step 3.7 Flash

Overview