Skip to content
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
Sign Up
Sign Up
OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

Step 3.7 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B

Compare Step 3.7 Flash from stepfun and Gemma 4 31B from Google on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Step 3.7 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B: side-by-side summary

Step 3.7 Flash and Gemma 4 31B are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

Step 3.7 Flash, from stepfun, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.16/M tokens input, $0.92/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Gemma 4 31B, from Google, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.09/M tokens input, $0.34/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • Step 3.7 Flash: 262,144 tokens
  • Gemma 4 31B: 262,144 tokens
Price
  • Step 3.7 Flash: $0.16/M tokens input, $0.92/M tokens output
  • Gemma 4 31B: $0.09/M tokens input, $0.34/M tokens output
Provided by
  • Step 3.7 Flash: stepfun
  • Gemma 4 31B: Google
  • Step 3.7 Flash model details, providers and pricing
  • Gemma 4 31B model details, providers and pricing