Compare MiMo-V2.5 from Xiaomi and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 from DeepSeek on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.


MiMo-V2.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
MiMo-V2.5, from Xiaomi, has a 1,050,000-token context window and is priced at $0.119/M tokens input, $0.238/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.03276/M tokens input, $1.152/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | MiMo-V2.5 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.119/M tokens | $0.03276/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.238/M tokens | $1.152/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 25.2 | 18.9 |
| Coding Index | 56.8 | Not available |
| Agentic Index | 15.8 | Not available |
| Latency (p50) | 4.37 s | 1.06 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 18.0 tok/s | 28.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
MiMo-V2.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 trade off on price: MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.119/M tokens input and $0.238/M tokens output, while DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs $0.03276/M tokens input and $1.152/M tokens output, so DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is cheaper for input tokens and MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper for output tokens.
MiMo-V2.5 has the longer context window at 1,050,000 tokens, compared with 1,048,576 tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 28.0 tokens per second compared with 18.0 tokens per second for MiMo-V2.5.