Compare MiMo-V2.5 from Xiaomi and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 from DeepSeek on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
| Attribute | MiMo-V2.5 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.119/M tokens | $0.05/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.238/M tokens | $0.45/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | Not available | Not available |
| Coding Index | 56.8 | 52.0 |
| Agentic Index | 15.8 | 26.3 |
| Latency (p50) | Not available | 0.45 s |
| Throughput (p50) | Not available | 98.0 tok/s |
| Provided by | Xiaomi | DeepSeek |
| Model page | MiMo-V2.5 model details, providers and pricing | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 model details, providers and pricing |
Benchmark data updated
MiMo-V2.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 trade off on price: MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.119/M tokens input and $0.238/M tokens output, while DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs $0.05/M tokens input and $0.45/M tokens output, so DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is cheaper for input tokens and MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper for output tokens.
MiMo-V2.5 has the longer context window at 1,050,000 tokens, compared with 1,048,576 tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423.
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 56.8 compared with 52.0 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423.