Skip to content
Alpha
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori

Footer

OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Ori
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Tools
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • EU routing
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status
  • AI Site Map

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

MiMo-V2.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Compare MiMo-V2.5 from Xiaomi and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 from DeepSeek on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Favicon for xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
Favicon for deepseek
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Favicon for xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
Favicon for deepseek
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Overview

MiMo-V2.5
Author
Xiaomi
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Author
DeepSeek
MiMo-V2.5
Context length
1.05Mtokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Context length
1.05Mtokens
MiMo-V2.5
Reasoning
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Reasoning
MiMo-V2.5
Input modalities
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input modalities
MiMo-V2.5
Output modalities
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Output modalities

MiMo-V2.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: side-by-side summary

MiMo-V2.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

MiMo-V2.5, from Xiaomi, has a 1,050,000-token context window and is priced at $0.119/M tokens input, $0.238/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, from DeepSeek, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.021/M tokens input, $0.528/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • MiMo-V2.5: 1,050,000 tokens
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens
Price
  • MiMo-V2.5: $0.119/M tokens input, $0.238/M tokens output
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: $0.021/M tokens input, $0.528/M tokens output
Provided by
  • MiMo-V2.5: Xiaomi
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: DeepSeek
  • MiMo-V2.5 model details, providers and pricing
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 model details, providers and pricing

MiMo-V2.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 at a glance

MiMo-V2.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 comparison
AttributeMiMo-V2.5DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input price$0.119/M tokens$0.021/M tokens
Output price$0.238/M tokens$0.528/M tokens
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Intelligence Index21.834.3
Coding Index56.869.1
Agentic Index15.841.0
Latency (p50)2.62 s0.73 s
Throughput (p50)34.0 tok/s60.0 tok/s

Benchmark data updated Oct 13, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5 cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?

MiMo-V2.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 trade off on price: MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.119/M tokens input and $0.238/M tokens output, while DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.021/M tokens input and $0.528/M tokens output, so DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper for input tokens and MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper for output tokens.

Which has the longer context window, MiMo-V2.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?

MiMo-V2.5 has the longer context window at 1,050,000 tokens, compared with 1,048,576 tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731.

Which is faster, MiMo-V2.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 60.0 tokens per second compared with 34.0 tokens per second for MiMo-V2.5.

Which scores higher on coding, MiMo-V2.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 69.1 compared with 56.8 for MiMo-V2.5.