Skip to content
Alpha
  • Models
  • Rankings
  • Ori
ElevenLabs launch offer: every ElevenLabs model is 50% off through October 19, 2026. See ElevenLabs models

Footer

OpenRouterOpenRouter
© 2026 OpenRouter, Inc

Product

  • Chat
  • Rankings
  • Benchmarks
  • Apps
  • Discover
  • Models
  • Ori
  • Collections
  • Providers
  • Tools
  • Pricing
  • Business
  • EU routing
  • Enterprise
  • Labs

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
    Hiring
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Trust Center
  • Support
  • Works With OR
  • Data
  • Brand

Developer

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • Developer Platform
  • Status
  • AI Site Map

Connect

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Compare GLM 5.3 Flash from Z.ai and Ling 3.0 Flash from inclusionai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.

Favicon for z-ai
GLM 5.3 Flash
Favicon for inclusionai
Ling 3.0 Flash
Favicon for z-ai
GLM 5.3 Flash
Favicon for inclusionai
Ling 3.0 Flash

Overview

GLM 5.3 Flash
Author
Z.ai
Ling 3.0 Flash
Author
inclusionai
GLM 5.3 Flash
Context length
1.05Mtokens
Ling 3.0 Flash
Context length
262Ktokens
GLM 5.3 Flash
Reasoning
Ling 3.0 Flash
Reasoning
GLM 5.3 Flash
Input modalities
Ling 3.0 Flash
Input modalities
GLM 5.3 Flash
Output modalities
Ling 3.0 Flash
Output modalities

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash: side-by-side summary

GLM 5.3 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.

GLM 5.3 Flash, from Z.ai, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.048/M tokens input, $0.16/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Ling 3.0 Flash, from inclusionai, has a 262,144-token context window and is priced at $0.021/M tokens input, $0.063/M tokens output on OpenRouter.

Context window
  • GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens
  • Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens
Price
  • GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.048/M tokens input, $0.16/M tokens output
  • Ling 3.0 Flash: $0.021/M tokens input, $0.063/M tokens output
Provided by
  • GLM 5.3 Flash: Z.ai
  • Ling 3.0 Flash: inclusionai
  • GLM 5.3 Flash model details, providers and pricing
  • Ling 3.0 Flash model details, providers and pricing

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash at a glance

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash comparison
AttributeGLM 5.3 FlashLing 3.0 Flash
Input price$0.048/M tokens$0.021/M tokens
Output price$0.16/M tokens$0.063/M tokens
Context window1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens
Intelligence Index41.820.1
Coding Index71.550.6
Agentic Index50.919.3
Latency (p50)0.80 s0.88 s
Throughput (p50)63.0 tok/s137.0 tok/s

Benchmark data updated Oct 9, 2026

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM 5.3 Flash cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on OpenRouter: Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.021/M tokens input and $0.063/M tokens output, while GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.048/M tokens input and $0.16/M tokens output.

Which has the longer context window, GLM 5.3 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash has the longer context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 262,144 tokens for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Which is faster, GLM 5.3 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 137.0 tokens per second compared with 63.0 tokens per second for GLM 5.3 Flash.

Which scores higher on coding, GLM 5.3 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 71.5 compared with 50.6 for Ling 3.0 Flash.