Compare GLM 5.3 from Z.ai and GLM 5.3 Flash from Z.ai on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the OpenRouter API.
GLM 5.3 and GLM 5.3 Flash are available through the OpenRouter API, so switching between them takes a model slug change rather than a new integration.
GLM 5.3, from Z.ai, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.079/M tokens input, $4.80/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
GLM 5.3 Flash, from Z.ai, has a 1,048,576-token context window and is priced at $0.0261/M tokens input, $0.90/M tokens output on OpenRouter.
| Attribute | GLM 5.3 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.079/M tokens | $0.0261/M tokens |
| Output price | $4.80/M tokens | $0.90/M tokens |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 44.8 | 41.8 |
| Coding Index | 74.8 | 71.5 |
| Agentic Index | 53.1 | 50.9 |
| Latency (p50) | 0.93 s | 4.85 s |
| Throughput (p50) | 73.0 tok/s | 17.0 tok/s |
Benchmark data updated
GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper than GLM 5.3 on OpenRouter: GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.0261/M tokens input and $0.90/M tokens output, while GLM 5.3 costs $0.079/M tokens input and $4.80/M tokens output.
GLM 5.3 and GLM 5.3 Flash have the same context window of 1,048,576 tokens.
GLM 5.3 is faster on OpenRouter, generating a median 73.0 tokens per second compared with 17.0 tokens per second for GLM 5.3 Flash.
GLM 5.3 scores higher on coding, with an Artificial Analysis Coding Index of 74.8 compared with 71.5 for GLM 5.3 Flash.