October 2026 data recap

Tokens rose 37% in October

Our breakdown of the AI highlights from last month. Tokens soared, price per token continued to fall, and agentic traffic now makes up most of what runs through OpenRouter.

亮点

  • Token volume kept rising: up 37% from September and almost 25x from January.
  • Effective price per token fell: the blended average price per token kept marching down, and last month it was 57 to 70% below January averages.
  • Decision models now see 21% of all requests: though the category is only weeks old, decision models now get more requests than any modality other than text models.

790 trillion tokens in October

October was the largest month in OpenRouter's history: 790T tokens, up 37% from September and a startling 25x from January.

The increase was broad based, but the refresh of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, together with the introduction of Haiku 5.5 and the rest of the Claude 5.5 family, were major contributors.

Monthly volume, January to October

OpenRouter
Source: OpenRouter. Tokens are prompt plus completion.

Agents consume 76% of all tokens

Agent dominance has only increased over the course of 2026. We classify every API key as agentic, human or mixed with a weighted classifier of seven signals, including tool-call rate, number of turns and request timing.

A year ago agentic keys took 8% of tokens. In October they took 76%, about 600T tokens.

Monthly tokens by type

OpenRouter
Source: OpenRouter. Keys classified monthly: agentic score of 0.50 or more is agentic, 0.25 to 0.49 is mixed, below 0.25 is human.

A distinguishing feature of agentic usage is resending the same, often extensive, context on every turn, so prompt caching matters more for agents than for human usage. Most providers served cached prefixes for 85 to 97% of agentic prompt tokens in October. The median cache hit rate has risen steeply, from 76.1% in June to over 90% in October.

Agentic cache hit rate by inference provider

OpenRouter

Bubble size is agentic tokens served. Color shows the cache hit rate band.

  • Under 70% cache hit rate
  • 70–90%
  • Over 90%
Source: OpenRouter. Cache hit rate is cached prompt tokens over prompt tokens, from agentic API keys. Excludes BYOK. Providers with at least 1T agentic tokens and a cache hit rate of 50% or more.

Open weights bounced back

The open-weight share of paid tokens fell to 52% in the week of September 28, when Claude Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol all launched. Two weeks later it was back above 70%, primarily due to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.

Open weights take about a quarter of paid spend, up from 11% in January, and that share has barely moved over the last quarter or so.

Weekly open-weight share of tokens and spend

OpenRouter
Source: OpenRouter. Paid traffic only; excludes free variants.

Effective price per token fell 57 to 70% since January

The blended price per million tokens fell from $1.21 to $0.52 for closed-weight models and from $0.28 to $0.084 for open weights. The gap between them widened from 4.3× to 6.2×.

This effective price can move for many reasons: the list prices of the models, the model mix itself, or the cache hit rate per session. Most of the August drop in closed-weight prices was a mix shift: GPT-5.6 Luna, at about $0.07 per million tokens, became the most used paid closed model in the days after its launch.

Effective price per 1M tokens

OpenRouter
Source: OpenRouter. Billed usage over prompt plus completion tokens. Excludes free variants, BYOK, stealth models and non-chat APIs.

Individual lab model share

Typically, each lab's traffic is concentrated in a few models, and the newest release usually takes over within a month. Pick a lab to see how its token and spend mix moved through the year.

Model mix within each lab

OpenRouter

Top six models by October tokens, plus everything else.

  • Claude Opus 5.5
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5
  • Claude Haiku 5.5
  • Claude Opus 5
  • Claude Sonnet 5
  • Claude Fable 5.1
  • Other

token 占比

支出占比

Source: OpenRouter. Monthly share of tokens and billed usage by model within each lab, all variants.

Open-weight labs lead in growth

Since May, Z.ai's monthly tokens grew about twentyfold and DeepSeek's about twelvefold. On the spend side, Z.ai's grew about sixfold, Anthropic's rose 76%, and MiniMax's fell 20% even as its tokens grew substantially.

Growth for individual labs is rarely linear. In an ever more competitive release calendar, the timing of a new model can move a lab's growth sharply in a single month.

Growth since May by lab

OpenRouter

Monthly tokens or spend for each lab, indexed to May = 100.

Source: OpenRouter. Monthly prompt plus completion tokens and billed usage by model maker, all variants, divided by each lab's May total.

The task leaderboard features two models prominently

We classify a sample of requests into the task categories on our rankings page. By tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads most coding and agent tasks. Switch to spend and Claude Opus 5.5 leads most of the board.

Other models making an appearance include Jev 1.13, the decision model from TypeSafe, and GLM 5.3 Flash, with strong showings in both Data Extraction and Data Transformation.

Top model per task, October

OpenRouter

Top five tasks in each category by tokens. The rankings taxonomy has two data tasks.

常规

  1. 分类

    typesafe 的网站图标
    TypeSafe Jev 1.13

    14% of task tokens

  2. Q&A & Knowledge

    stepfun 的网站图标
    Step 5 Preview

    33% of task tokens

  3. Roleplay & Fiction

    deepseek 的网站图标
    DeepSeek V4 Flash

    11% of task tokens

  4. Content Writing

    z-ai 的网站图标
    GLM 5.3 Flash

    21% of task tokens

  5. Summarization

    stepfun 的网站图标
    Step 5 Preview

    67% of task tokens

编程

  1. Code Generation

    deepseek 的网站图标
    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

    23% of task tokens

  2. Debugging

    deepseek 的网站图标
    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

    19% of task tokens

  3. File I/O

    deepseek 的网站图标
    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

    17% of task tokens

  4. Code Review

    deepseek 的网站图标
    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

    17% of task tokens

  5. Shell Execution

    deepseek 的网站图标
    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

    24% of task tokens

Agent

  1. Workflow Execution

    deepseek 的网站图标
    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

    16% of task tokens

  2. Multi-step Planning

    deepseek 的网站图标
    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

    18% of task tokens

  3. Tool Dispatch

    deepseek 的网站图标
    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

    17% of task tokens

  4. Memory Extraction

    xiaomi 的网站图标
    MiMo V2.6 Flash

    17% of task tokens

  5. 网页搜索

    deepseek 的网站图标
    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

    15% of task tokens

数据

  1. Data Extraction

    z-ai 的网站图标
    GLM 5.3 Flash

    12% of task tokens

  2. Data Transformation

    z-ai 的网站图标
    GLM 5.3 Flash

    29% of task tokens

Source: OpenRouter. Share of sample-weighted task tokens or spend.

The closed-weight labs (and DeepSeek) lead in user retention

There are many ways to measure retention for a model or a lab. Here we took the accounts that sent at least 100 paid requests in a month to models from a given lab and checked how many used the same lab again the next month. The threshold filters out one-off trials, and the order of labs was very similar at lower and higher cut-offs.

From September to October, Google kept 78% of those accounts, Anthropic 74% and OpenAI 74%. The leading open-weight labs tend to have lower retention month over month, and October was no different.

Month-over-month retention by model maker

OpenRouter

Google

Anthropic

OpenAI

DeepSeek

Z.ai

Qwen

MiniMax

Source: OpenRouter. Accounts with at least 100 paid requests to a lab in a month; retained if they sent any paid request to that lab the next month. Excludes banned accounts.

Decision models reached 21% of requests

Decision models (or System One models, in TypeSafe’s nomenclature) judge a narrow question, such as routing, moderation or a yes-or-no check. They were only born as a category in mid-September and rose to 21% of all requests by the week of October 26.

Text models here means every request to the chat completions API, including requests with image inputs. On tokens or spend instead of requests, decision models would take a much smaller slice of weekly traffic.

Weekly share of requests by request type

OpenRouter
Source: OpenRouter. Share of all requests by API.

Open-weight inference providers: Together climbs to first

Among providers serving open-weight models, Together moved from 18th in June to first in October by total tokens served. DeepSeek fell to ninth in September and returned to second with V4.1 Flash, and InferenceNet entered the top ten at fourth.

Open-weight provider rank by tokens

OpenRouter

Top ten each month, June to October. Hover a line to follow a provider.

Source: OpenRouter. Open-weight models only. Excludes BYOK and stealth endpoints.

We analyze key trends from this quadrillion-token pool every week. Subscribe to Inferred, our data newsletter, to get all our major research reports straight to your inbox.

Notes on methodology

  • Data covers requests through the OpenRouter API from January 1 to October 31, 2026; the agentic chart starts in September 2025. Weekly charts use weeks that start on Monday.
  • Tokens are prompt plus completion tokens. Spend is billed usage. Labs are model makers, and a model is open-weight when its weights are publicly released.
  • Each API key is classified every month from seven weighted signals: tool-call rate, input-to-output ratio, turns per request, cache hit rate, tools offered per request, time between requests and cancel rate. A score of 0.50 or more is agentic, 0.25 to 0.49 is mixed and below 0.25 is human.
  • Paid traffic excludes free model variants.
  • Effective price, cache hit rate and provider rank exclude bring-your-own-key (BYOK) traffic and stealth models. Cache hit rate is cached prompt tokens over prompt tokens on traffic from agentic keys, for providers with at least 1T agentic tokens that month.
  • Task leaders come from a sample of requests classified into the rankings task taxonomy and weighted by sampling rate.
  • Retention counts accounts with at least 100 paid requests to a lab's models in a month, and calls an account retained if it sent any paid request to that lab the next month. Banned accounts are excluded.
  • Decision models are requests to the decisions API. Text models are requests to the chat completions API, including requests with image inputs.